<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conair WM200R Body Benefits Heated Body Flex Massager</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2</link>
	<description>From the Chicago Massagerie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:44:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edward V. Hawk</title>
		<link>http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward V. Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Below average&lt;br&gt;Rating:2 out of 5 stars&lt;br&gt;Heat on mine doesn&#039;t work, not sure if it&#039;s broken, or it just never get&#039;s above luke warm...
&lt;br /&gt;It feels cheap; when putting pressure on your neck are, it feels/sounds like it might break... Not terribly ergonomic, hard to get leverage, not very comfortable, and the motor isn&#039;t that powerful.
&lt;br /&gt;It isn&#039;t very expensive, but I would say go for one of the other Wahl models for $10 more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below average<br />Rating:2 out of 5 stars<br />Heat on mine doesn&#8217;t work, not sure if it&#8217;s broken, or it just never get&#8217;s above luke warm&#8230;<br />
<br />It feels cheap; when putting pressure on your neck are, it feels/sounds like it might break&#8230; Not terribly ergonomic, hard to get leverage, not very comfortable, and the motor isn&#8217;t that powerful.<br />
<br />It isn&#8217;t very expensive, but I would say go for one of the other Wahl models for $10 more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Kirby</title>
		<link>http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Kirby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Not so great&lt;br&gt;Rating:2 out of 5 stars&lt;br&gt;I just got this massager today and the heater broke! I got it to work the first time and it wasn&#039;t all that warm. Then my husband tried it and said the heat wasn&#039;t working. Sure enough, the little switch was loose and no more heat. Also, the quality isn&#039;t all that great. I got it for shoulder pain from a rotator cuff injury, but I&#039;m going to return it and try the Wahl that got much better ratings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so great<br />Rating:2 out of 5 stars<br />I just got this massager today and the heater broke! I got it to work the first time and it wasn&#8217;t all that warm. Then my husband tried it and said the heat wasn&#8217;t working. Sure enough, the little switch was loose and no more heat. Also, the quality isn&#8217;t all that great. I got it for shoulder pain from a rotator cuff injury, but I&#8217;m going to return it and try the Wahl that got much better ratings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chicagomassagerie.com/conair-wm200r-body-benefits-heated-body-flex-massager-2#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Ineffective Massager&lt;br&gt;Rating:1 out of 5 stars&lt;br&gt;I used this Conair massager one time and knew it was not for me or my family.  I previously had a Panasonic Reach Easy model EV290w and it was a lot more powerful.  This Conair has weak pressure and the switches are difficult to move.  I liked the curved neck.  The heating area was too small and not hot.  I returned this product the next day.
&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ineffective Massager<br />Rating:1 out of 5 stars<br />I used this Conair massager one time and knew it was not for me or my family.  I previously had a Panasonic Reach Easy model EV290w and it was a lot more powerful.  This Conair has weak pressure and the switches are difficult to move.  I liked the curved neck.  The heating area was too small and not hot.  I returned this product the next day.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
